Photocatalytic hydrogen production using metal nanoparticle-modified semiconductors

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Apr 12, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2024.33.69825
Keywords:
photocatalytic hydrogen production, metal nanoparticles, photoelectrochemistry

Main Article Content

David Ramírez Ortega
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3643-0710
Diana Clemencia Guerrero Araque
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Conacyt, Departamento de Química
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-5525
Próspero Acevedo Peña
Instituto Politécnico Nacional-Conahcyt, CICATA Legaria
Rodolfo Zanella-Specia
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-5898

Abstract

This review paper focuses on photocatalytic hydrogen production using sacrificial agents and semiconductors modified with metal nanoparticles. While the use of sacrificial agents reduces the energy required for hydrogen production and eliminates the recombination of photogenerated holes, the surface modification of semiconductors with metal nanoparticles changes the flow of photoinduced charge carriers, decreasing the recombination of electron-hole pairs and increasing the number of catalytic active sites for reduction. In addition, the impact of electrochemical and photoelectrochemical techniques on the characterization of the photocatalysts, the semiconductor/electrolyte interface, and the modification of the Fermi level when these components are in contact is described. These electrochemical determinations provide information on the band diagram (valence and/or conduction band positions), energy states of the semiconductor, interaction of the photocatalyst with the co-catalysts, separation of the electron-hole species, use of illumination, and resistance to charge transfer. Establishing a relationship between the photocatalytic activity of semiconductors and their electrochemical characterization allows understand the charge transfer processes involved in such a reaction.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramírez Ortega, D., Guerrero Araque, D. C., Acevedo Peña, P., & Zanella-Specia, R. (2024). Photocatalytic hydrogen production using metal nanoparticle-modified semiconductors. Mundo Nano. Interdisciplinary Journal on Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, 17(33), 1e-27e. https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2024.33.69825
Issue
Vol. 17 No. 33 (2024): 2do semestre / Número especial
Section
Review articles

Licencia Creative Commons
Mundo Nano. Revista Interdisciplinaria en Nanociencias y Nanotecnología por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://www.mundonano.unam.mx.

Author Biography

Rodolfo Zanella-Specia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología

Ingeniero químico y maestro en Ingeniería química por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Doctor en Ingeniería y Alta Tecnología por la Universidad Paris VI, ha publicado 160 artículos en revistas indizadas y 5 capítulos de libro relacionados con la síntesis de nanocatalizadores y su uso para abatir la contaminación del aire y del agua, así como para la producción de combustibles limpios como el hidrógeno. Ha dirigido 56 tesis de todos los niveles académicos, en 2013 fue merecedor de la Distinción Universidad Nacional para Jóvenes Académicos en el área de investigación en Ciencias Exactas. Pertenece al Sistema Nacional de Investigadores en el nivel III. Actualmente es Investigador Titular en e Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología-UNAM.

Scopus Author ID: 7004070438

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-5898

References

Acevedo-Peña, P. et al. (2011). Generación de estados superficiales durante la formación electroforética catódica de películas de TiO2 sobre ito. Química Nova, 34(3): 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-40422011000300005.

Armaroli, N. y Balzani, V. (2011). The hydrogen issue. Chem Sus Chem, 4(1): 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000182.

Arzate Salgado, S. Y. et al. (2016). Photocatalytic hydrogen production in a solar pilot plant using a Au/TiO2 photo catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(28): 11933-11940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.039.

Barrios, C. E. et al. (2016). Photocatalytic hydrogen production over titania modified by gold – metal (palladium, nickel and cobalt) catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(48): 23287-23300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.206.

Bedoya-Lora, F. E., Holmes-Gentle, I. y Hankin, A. (2021). Electrochemical techniques for photoelectrode characterisation. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 29: 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100463.

Beranek, R. (2011). (Photo)electrochemical methods for the determination of the band edge positions of TiO2-based nanomaterials. Advances in Physical Chemistry, 2011(Iv): 80-83. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/786759.

Cai, Y. y Feng, Y. P. (2016). Review on charge transfer and chemical activity of TiO2: mechanism and applications. Progress in Surface Science, 91(4): 183-202. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.progsurf.2016.11.001.

Camposeco, R., Hinojosa-Reyes, M. y Zanella, R. (2021). Highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by using Rh as co-catalyst in the Cu/TiO2 system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.216.

Cao, S. et al. (2018). Effect of sacrificial agents on the dispersion of metal cocatalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Applied Surface Science, 442: 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.105.

Chen, W. T. et al. (2015). Effect of TiO2 polymorph and alcohol sacrificial agent on the activity of Au/TiO2 photocatalysts for H2 production in alcohol-water mixtures. Journal of Catalysis, 329_ 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2015.06.014.

Chen, X. et al. (2012). Nanomaterials for renewable energy production and storage. Chemical Society Reviews, 41(23): 7909-7937. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35230c.

Chiarello, G. L., Aguirre, M. H. y Selli, E. (2010). Hydrogen production by photocatalytic steam reforming of methanol on noble metal-modified TiO2. Journal of Catalysis, 273(2): 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.05.012.

Corredor, J. et al. (2019). Comprehensive review and future perspectives on the photocatalytic hydrogen production. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 94(10): 3049-3063. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6123.

Davis, K. A. et al. (2021). Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from biomass conversion. Nano Convergence, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-021-00256-9.

Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K. y Matthews, H. D. (2010). Future CO2 emissions and climate change from exixting energy infrastructure. Science, 329: 1330-1333. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642352-9.

Durán-Álvarez, J. C., Zanella, R. y Oros-Ruíz, S. (2014). Superficial modification of semiconductors with gold nanoparticles for photocatalytic applications. RSC Catalysis Series, (18): 155-228, enero. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782621645-00155.

Fajrina, N. y Tahir, M. (2019). A critical review in strategies to improve photocatalytic water splitting towards hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(2): 540-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.200.

Gouda, A. et al. (2021). Best practices in photoelectrochemistry. Journal of Power Sources, 482: 228958, septiembre. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228958.

Grewe, T., Meggouh, M. y Tüysüz, H. (2016). Nanocatalysts for solar water splitting and a perspective on hydrogen economy. Chemistry – An Asian Journal, 11(1): 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201500723.

Guerrero-Araque, D. et al. (2017). Charge transfer processes involved in photocatalytic hydrogen production over CuO/ZrO2–TiO2 materials. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.050.

Hankin, A. et al. (2019). Flat band potential determination: avoiding the pitfalls. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 7(45): 26162-26176. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta09569a.

Hernández-Gordillo, A. et al. (2018). Photoreduction of 4-Nitrophenol in the presence of carboxylic acid using CdS nanofibers. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 29(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8724-x.

Holladay, J. D. et al. (2009). An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today, 139(4): 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039.

Hou, W. y Cronin, S. B. (2013). A review of surface plasmon resonance-enhanced photocatalysi. Advanced Functional Materials, 23(13): 1612-1619. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202148.

Kocha, S. S. et al. (2017). Best practices and testing protocols for benchmarking ORR activities of fuel cell electrocatalysts using rotating disk electrode. Electrocatalysis, 8(4): 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-017-0378-6.

Kou, J. et al. (2017). Selectivity enhancement in heterogeneous photocatalytic transformations. Chemical Reviews, 117(3): 1445-1514. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00396.

Kudo, A. y Miseki, Y. (2009). Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chemical Society Reviews, 38(1): 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1039/b800489g.

Kumaravel, V. et al. (2019). Photocatalytic hydrogen production: role of sacrificial reagents on the activity of oxide, carbon, and sulfide catalysts. Catalysts, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030276.

Lewis, N. S. y Nocera, D. G. (2006). Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(43): 15729-15735. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603395103.

Lin, W. C. et al. (2009). Hydrogen production from methanol/water photocatalytic decomposition using pt/tio2-xnx catalyst. Energy and Fuels, 23(4): 2192-2196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef801091p.

Luna, A. L. et al. (2016). Synergetic effect of Ni and Au nanoparticles synthesized on titania particles for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 191: 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.008.

Ma, Z. et al. (2020). Highlighting unique function of immobilized superoxide on TiO2 for selective photocatalytic degradation. Separation and Purification Technology, 238: 116402, diciembre. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116402.

McGlade, C. y Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 ºC. Nature, 517(7533): 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14016.

Melián, E. P. et al. (2016). Study of the photocatalytic activity of Pt-modified commercial for hydrogen production in the presence of common organic sacrificial agents. Applied Catalysis A: General, 518: 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.09.033.

Nguyen-Phan, T. D. et al. (2016). Visible light-driven H2 production over highly dispersed ruthenia on rutile TiO2 nanorods. ACS Catalysis, 6(1): 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b02318.

Oros-Ruiz, S. et al. (2013). Photocatalytic hydrogen production by water/methanol decomposition using Au/TiO2 prepared by deposition-precipitation with urea. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 263(2013): 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.057.

Oros-Ruiz, S. et al. (2014). Photocatalytic hydrogen production by Au-MxOy (MAg, Cu, Ni) catalysts supported on TiO2. Catalysis Communications, 47: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.12.033.

Primo, A., Corma, A. y García, H. (2011). Titania supported gold nanoparticles as photocatalyst. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13(3): 886-910. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00917b.

Ramírez-Ortega, D. et al. (2020). Effect of Pd and Cu co-catalyst on the charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over WO3–TiO2 heterojunction. Journal of Materials Science, 55(35): 16641-16658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05188-z.

Schneider, J. y Bahnemann, D. W. (2013). Undesired role of sacrificial reagents in photocatalysis. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 4(20): 3479-3483. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz4018199.

Toe, C. Y. et al. (2021). Advancing photoreforming of organics: highlights on photocatalyst and system designs for selective oxidation reactions. Energy and Environmental Science, 14(3): 1140-1175. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee03116j.

Walter, M. G. et al. (2010). Solar water splitting cells. Chemical Reviews, 110(11): 6446-6473. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326.

Xu, Z. et al. (2018). Towards enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen generation: which is more important, alloy synergistic effect or plasmonic effect? Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 221: 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.085.

Zada, A. et al. (2016). Exceptional visible-light-driven cocatalyst-free photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4 by well designed nanocomposites with plasmonic Au and SnO2. Advanced Energy Materials, 6(21). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601190.

Zada, A. et al. (2020). Surface plasmonic-assisted photocatalysis and optoelectronic devices with noble metal nanocrystals: design, synthesis, and applications. Advanced Functional Materials, 30(7): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906744.

Zhang, P., Wang, T. y Gong, J. (2018). Current mechanistic understanding of surface reactions over water-splitting photocatalysts. Chem, 4(2): 223-245. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.003.